File #: 15-470    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Staff Report Status: Passed
File created: 10/21/2015 In control: Council
On agenda: 10/26/2015 Final action: 10/26/2015
Title: Repeal of "Building Repair or Demolition Bylaw (973 Lampson Place), 2000, No. 2440"
Attachments: 1. Staff Report ADM-15-039, 2. Bylaw 2440
REQUEST FOR DECISION

DATE: October 21, 2015 Report No. ADM-15-039
TO: Laurie Hurst, Chief Administrative Officer
FROM: Anja Nurvo, Director of Corporate Services
SUBJECT:

Title
Repeal of "Building Repair or Demolition Bylaw (973 Lampson Place), 2000, No. 2440"
End

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation
That Council repeal the "Building Repair or Demolition Bylaw (973 Lampson Place), 2000, No. 2440" and direct staff to cancel the Notice registered against the title to the subject property.
Body

RELEVANT POLICY:

Community Charter
BC Building Code
Building Code Bylaw, 2002, No. 2538, as amended

STRATEGIC RELEVANCE:

This Request for Decision does not directly relate to any of Council's Strategic Priorities.

BACKGROUND:

Attached is a copy of Bylaw 2440, which was passed on October 2, 2000 in order to deal with a residential building that was constructed in non-compliance with the Township's Building Code Bylaw at the time.

Pursuant to the Bylaw, the owner was given 60 days to repair the deficiencies noted in section 3 (1)-(4). As an alternative to making the specified repairs, the owner could either demolish the building or "provide Letters of Assurance that comply with the requirements of the British Columbia Building Code." In default of doing so, the Township may carry out the repair or demolition or obtain the Letters of Assurance at the expense of the owner.

Staff has recently been contacted by the current owner requesting that the Notice that had been registered against title to the property be removed. Staff reviewed the file and found that the owner had previously provided a Letter of Assurance from a qualified professional; accordingly, they had assumed that this matter had been adequately dealt with and that the conditions of the Bylaw had been met. However, upon further review, staff found that only 3 of the 4 issues required by the Bylaw had been addressed in the Letter of Assurance. Staff therefore ad...

Click here for full text