Skip to main content

The livestream of the meeting can be viewed on most devices. Should you experience technical difficulties, please review the troubleshooting guide for assistance. If the issue persists, please inform corporate.services@esquimalt.ca and we can relay the information to the webcast support company for assistance. Please note that staff technical support is not available outside of regular business hours or during meetings.

File #: 26-053    Version: 1 Name: Development Variance Permit - 884 Lampson St - Staff Report No. DEV-26-005
Type: Staff Report Status: Passed
File created: 1/29/2026 In control: Council
On agenda: 2/23/2026 Final action: 2/23/2026
Title: Development Variance Permit - 884 Lampson St - Staff Report No. DEV-26-005
Attachments: 1. APPENDIX A: DVP00176, 2. APPENDIX B: Aerial Map, 3. APPENDIX C: Applicant Letter, 4. APPENDIX D: Project Data and Parkade Drawings, 5. APPENDIX E: Servicing Drawings, 6. APPENDIX F: Applicant Presentation

TOWNSHIP OF ESQUIMALT STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE:  February 23, 2026                     Report No. DEV-26-005

 

TO:                       Council                                           

FROM:                      James Davison, Manager of Development Services

SUBJECT:                      Development Variance Permit Application - 884 Lampson St - Report No. DEV26-005

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

Recommendation

That Council approve the Development Variance Permit No. DP00176 to vary the parking ratio for required residential vehicle parking per unit, at 884 Lampson St within the CD No. 155 Zone, from 0.92 to 0.73, as outlined in Staff Report No. DEV-26-005.

Body

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

 

The applicant wishes to obtain a variance to the vehicle parking requirement of 0.93 spaces per residential unit within the CD No. 155 zone to 0.73, a ratio which matches the parking requirements within Parking Bylaw, 2025, No. 3089. The applicant is also proposing an increase in long-term bicycle parking provision, from 129 stalls to 146 stalls, with 20% of the long-term stalls sized for cargo bikes. There is a 10% total TDM reduction in vehicle parking due to the cargo bike provision and a car-share provision.

 

BACKGROUND:

 

The vehicle parking requirement for the property is written into the CD No. 155 zone directly rather than simply referencing the current Parking Bylaw. The intent of writing the parking requirement into the zone was to reduce the vehicle parking requirement from 155 parking spaces (at 1.2 stalls per unit plus 0.1 for visitor) to 110 spaces. The commissioned Parking Study at the time suggested 100 parking spaces was the total site parking demand (a 0.84 ratio).

 

A S.219 Covenant is in place on the site, which requires the provision of the following parking-related TDM measures:

 

                     50% of bicycle parking having access to Level 1 outlets (120V)

                     Provision of seven e-bikes in bikeshare program

                     12 visitor parking spaces to be provided outside of the security gate

                     One Modo carshare outside of the security gate with membership provided for 67 of the units in perpetuity

 

The new Parking Bylaw (adopted 2025) would require 95 total vehicle spaces as a base, and the provision of a car share and 20% of supplied bicycle parking as oversized parking reduces the required vehicle parking spaces by 10% through traffic demand measures allowances in the Parking Bylaw. This brings the Parking Bylaw’s requirement to 86 vehicle spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 88 total vehicle spaces.

 

Chronology:

 

Development Permit approved - April 22, 2024

Rezoning Public Hearing - November 20, 2023

 

Advisory Planning Commission Recommendation:

 

That the Advisory Planning Commission recommends that Council approve the Development Variance Permit application to vary the parking ratio for required residential vehicle parking per unit, at 884 Lampson St within the CD No. 155 Zone, from 0.92 to 0.73, as outlined in Staff Report No. APC-26-003, as it is in compliance with the updated parking bylaw; and

 

That the applicant provides an updated engineering report to Council.

 

ANALYSIS:

 

Staff is supportive of the variance application as the parking variance proposed matches the requirement of the current Parking Bylaw.

 

The APC recommendation around providing an updated report to Staff will be responded to by the applicant by having the Traffic Engineer available for questions at the Council meeting. Staff does not request traffic studies if the parking request meets the Parking Bylaw. Staff does not believe that the Parking Study commissioned at the time of rezoning, which stated that 100 total vehicle spaces was the site parking demand at the time, warrants updating considering that the applicant is merely wishing to meet the existing Parking Bylaw requirements. The applicant, it should be noted, is providing significantly more bicycle parking than proposed at time of rezoning (from 129 stalls to 146 long-term bicycle stalls). The Parking Bylaw would require 148 total long-term bicycle stalls. As the applicant had submitted a Building Permit application in advance of the current Parking Bylaw being adopted, the applicant has no responsibility to adhere to the current Parking Bylaw in any fashion.

  

 

OPTIONS:

 

1.                     That Council approve Development Variance Permit No. DVP00176.

 

2.                     That Council postpone consideration of Development Variance Permit No. DVP00176 pending receipt of additional information.

 

3.                     That Council deny Development Variance Permit No. DVP00176.

 

COUNCIL PRIORITY:

 

Housing

 

FINANCIAL IMPACT: 

 

There is no financial impact associated with this application.

 

COMMUNICATIONS/ENGAGEMENT: 

 

Notices of the variances was sent to owners and occupants of properties within 50m of the subject property.

 

TIMELINES & NEXT STEPS:

 

The next step for this project is Demolition Permit and Building Permit processes.

 

REPORT REVIEWED BY:

 

1.                     Bill Brown, Director of Development Services, Reviewed

2.                     Ian Irvine, Director of Finance, Reviewed

3.                     Deb Hopkins, Director of Corporate Services, Reviewed

4.                     Dan Horan, Chief Administrative Officer, Concurrence

 

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: 

 

Appendix A                     DVP00176

Appendix B                     Aerial Map

Appendix C                     Applicant Letter

Appendix D                     Project Data and Parkade Drawings

Appendix E                     Servicing Drawings

Appendix F                     Applicant Presentation